There are a few ideas important to living a life of virtue. This is also, in Christian circles, called spiritual development. I also draw implications for designing interventions to promote virtue.
Secret #1: Balance self-focus and other-focus. First, it isn’t all about me. It’s about others, but not totally about others. There is a sweet spot. The Greeks used the word eudaimonia to talk about virtue. It is about doing good for self and others. For the Greeks, though, one achieved great individual feats of virtue, and that was supposed to benefit the polis. I have found that actually we need to reverse the polarity. To have proper eudaimonia, we need to focus on others. We can rest assured that our survival instinct and natural self-interest (some Reformed theologians call this our fallen nature) will ensure that we have sufficient self-interest to provide a eudaimonic balance. An effective intervention will emphasize other-interest and will involve people using most of their time in focusing on doing positive things for others.
Secret #2: Balance willpower and habit. It isn’t all about willpower, which are Herculean efforts at self-control of temptation or self-control that aims us at doing good. Those times are, properly employed, necessary for us to hit the sweet spot. Willpower is, as Baumeister and Tierney (2011) have shown, a limited resource. The more willpower we exert, the less we have available to place on other tasks that involve willpower. Thus, counting on willpower to have us make wise and self-controlled choices is not a good bet. We can sometimes sustain willpower-empowered choices enough to change our personality and make continual great choices for virtue and to subdue vice. But, the sweet spot is to employ that willpower to change our environment so that we don’t have to make willpower-empowered choices. Instead of a dieter keeping chocolate in a dish on the table and expecting himself or herself to resist the temptation to grab a few nibbles every time he or she passes (oh, wow, it’s gone), the dieter stores the chocolate out of sight. Or better, the dieter stores it out of sight in a place where he or she has to climb and inconvenience the self and exert energy to get it. Or better still, don’t buy chocolate, if chocolate is the temptation. That arranges things so that the dieter has to go to the store, purchase chocolate, get it home, and then eat it for it to do any harm. Far better to change to a more virtuous self is to change the environment so that one creates new habits. Creating a new habit is not easy, but it is possible with willpower. Exert the energy in making a new habit, and one can follow the habit with little decision-making energy each time one faces the decision point. A good intervention will spend most of the time creating good habits, and arranging the environment so that temptations are minimized.
Secret #3: Balance God’s part and my part. Third, spiritual formation is about a positive, mind of Christ, that God forms in us. It is not about focusing on me and the character traits that I intend to form to be more Christ-like. It is not totally without my effort. Both grace and works are in the Christian New Testament, but they are in the right order and in the right amounts. Just focusing on God’s changing of the person will not produce change. On the other hand, just focusing on being better, more virtuous, happier, or move loving, skilled, etc. is also doomed to partial success at best. God has done the hard part in Jesus’ sacrificial, other-oriented death on our behalf. I cannot please God apart from that, but if I love God, I want to please God. I want to work to please God. I have an important part in that balance. A good intervention will focus on affirming God’s role, but realizing that, other than prayer, we can’t influence God’s part. Thus, it will direct the person to focus on changing his or her own part.
Secret #4: Balance promoting the virtue and combatting the vice. We cannot just focus on promoting the virtue. Temptations to vice arise, and we have to be well-prepared to deal with those.
Secret #5: Before getting the person immersed in sensing his or her deficit, affirm the person to avoid defensiveness. People need to feel like they are decent people who are making themselves better rather than be shown that they are depraved and desperately needy people.
Secret #6: Balance focus on achieving goals and on doing the goal-directed tasks needed to get to the goal. Numerous studies have shown that people who strive after happiness tend to be self-focused on their own happiness and thus are less happy and fulfilled. Those who struggle to be loving and keep focusing on how loving I am, how to be more loving, etc. tend to have less success at being loving. There is certainly benefit to self and others in trying to be more loving. It is better than focusing on being hateful, and even better than focusing on being neutral and never having a loving thought. But, there seems to be a sweet spot, somewhere between focusing on neutrality and total self-focus and self-concern with one’s lovingkindness. We might suggest that one must try to be more loving, and trying is important at first (see point two), but the trying is not to try and keep focusing on me. It is to try to focus on the object of love—on God and on other people. Also, one must employ willpower (see point two) to defeat the natural person’s self-interested, self-aggrandizing, self-protective, self-absorbed tendencies when they arise. One must employ willpower to do the loving thing when doing the loving thing is hard. We employ the left prefrontal cortex to do the hard thing. That goes against the natural tendencies (fallen nature, natural person), so it requires great energy. However, one must do the loving thing by setting up the external environment, and the internal thought habits to focus on the right thing most of the time and fight temptations or pursue calls to duty the rest of the time. A good intervention will introduce the goal early, but will not make the guts of the intervention about getting to the goal. Rather, keep the goal in mind, but more in the periphery of the mind than at the forefront of the mind.